Official-test comparison

HUGIML in the TabArena reference landscape

A dedicated leaderboard view for aligned outer-test comparisons. Search budgets and ensemble construction remain method-specific, so each pool is presented separately.

38 completed datasetsExact outer-split matchingDataset-balanced aggregation200 Elo bootstraps
Dataset-scale analysis

Tuned-model AUC gaps

Models follow their within-quadrant Elo rank. Bars show mean ROC-AUC delta; dots show median delta.

HUGIML mean deltaOfficial tuned model mean deltaMedian delta

Ordering is by TabArena rank, which uses ROC-AUC error for binary datasets and log loss for multiclass datasets. The displayed order is therefore not a ranking by the ROC-AUC values shown at right.

Multi-metric comparison

HUGIML and non-neural models

Dataset-balanced means across all completed datasets. Each delta is the paired HUGIML advantage; positive values favor HUGIML, including log loss after reversing its lower-is-better direction.

Default models

Default comparison

MethodAccuracyBalanced accuracyF1ROC AUCLog loss
HUGIML0.8727reference0.6895reference0.5645reference0.8461reference0.3063reference
CatBoost0.8800HUGIML Δ -0.00740.7033HUGIML Δ -0.01380.5832HUGIML Δ -0.01870.8578HUGIML Δ -0.01170.2885HUGIML Δ -0.0177
ExplainableBM0.8741HUGIML Δ -0.00150.6921HUGIML Δ -0.00270.5720HUGIML Δ -0.00750.8503HUGIML Δ -0.00420.3011HUGIML Δ -0.0052
ExtraTrees0.8704HUGIML Δ 0.00230.6814HUGIML Δ 0.00810.5555HUGIML Δ 0.00900.8365HUGIML Δ 0.00950.3353HUGIML Δ 0.0290
KNeighbors0.8195HUGIML Δ 0.05320.6005HUGIML Δ 0.08890.4439HUGIML Δ 0.12060.6981HUGIML Δ 0.14801.1295HUGIML Δ 0.8232
LightGBM0.8778HUGIML Δ -0.00520.6980HUGIML Δ -0.00850.5753HUGIML Δ -0.01080.8501HUGIML Δ -0.00400.2950HUGIML Δ -0.0112
LinearModel0.8570HUGIML Δ 0.01570.6617HUGIML Δ 0.02780.5260HUGIML Δ 0.03850.8260HUGIML Δ 0.02010.3591HUGIML Δ 0.0528
RandomForest0.8733HUGIML Δ -0.00060.6944HUGIML Δ -0.00490.5746HUGIML Δ -0.01010.8411HUGIML Δ 0.00500.3271HUGIML Δ 0.0209
XGBoost0.8780HUGIML Δ -0.00530.6982HUGIML Δ -0.00870.5755HUGIML Δ -0.01100.8522HUGIML Δ -0.00610.2934HUGIML Δ -0.0129
Tuned models

Tuned comparison

MethodAccuracyBalanced accuracyF1ROC AUCLog loss
HUGIML0.8727reference0.6895reference0.5645reference0.8461reference0.3063reference
CatBoost0.8806HUGIML Δ -0.00800.7053HUGIML Δ -0.01580.5850HUGIML Δ -0.02050.8579HUGIML Δ -0.01180.2871HUGIML Δ -0.0192
ExplainableBM0.8752HUGIML Δ -0.00250.6940HUGIML Δ -0.00450.5745HUGIML Δ -0.00990.8516HUGIML Δ -0.00550.2987HUGIML Δ -0.0076
ExtraTrees0.8753HUGIML Δ -0.00260.6858HUGIML Δ 0.00370.5539HUGIML Δ 0.01060.8491HUGIML Δ -0.00300.3027HUGIML Δ -0.0035
KNeighbors0.8288HUGIML Δ 0.04390.5879HUGIML Δ 0.10160.4027HUGIML Δ 0.16180.7365HUGIML Δ 0.10960.6743HUGIML Δ 0.3681
LightGBM0.8803HUGIML Δ -0.00760.7034HUGIML Δ -0.01400.5824HUGIML Δ -0.01790.8566HUGIML Δ -0.01050.2869HUGIML Δ -0.0194
LinearModel0.8574HUGIML Δ 0.01530.6646HUGIML Δ 0.02490.5300HUGIML Δ 0.03450.8281HUGIML Δ 0.01800.3558HUGIML Δ 0.0496
RandomForest0.8763HUGIML Δ -0.00360.6989HUGIML Δ -0.00950.5786HUGIML Δ -0.01410.8486HUGIML Δ -0.00260.3024HUGIML Δ -0.0039
XGBoost0.8798HUGIML Δ -0.00710.7042HUGIML Δ -0.01470.5835HUGIML Δ -0.01900.8563HUGIML Δ -0.01020.2880HUGIML Δ -0.0182
Reference pool

Default · overall

HUGIML plus 16 official variants · 38 completed datasets · Elo anchor RF (default) = 1000

HUGIML position11 / 17within this recomputed pool
Elo1136.595% interval 1018.9–1228.3
Average rank9.79lower is better
Normalized score0.155best = 1, dataset median = 0
Improvability19.27% (8.76%)mean (median); lower is better
Pool-relative results

Leaderboard

Every displayed statistic is recalculated using only this tab's methods.

#MethodElo95% intervalNormalized scoreAverage rankImprovability · mean (median)
1TABICL_GPU (default)1500.91406.3–1614.90.6783.575.54% (1.64%)
2CAT (default)1464.11371.5–1560.00.5784.058.07% (3.27%)
3TABM_GPU (default)1376.21264.5–1472.50.4635.3910.53% (3.58%)
4TABPFNV2_GPU (default)1318.31189.2–1430.30.4736.3910.98% (6.27%)
5MNCA_GPU (default)1293.61220.4–1376.40.2746.8412.65% (6.65%)
6XGB (default)1269.41196.0–1336.60.3097.2911.97% (9.47%)
7REALMLP (default)1261.01153.1–1349.70.2277.4512.47% (9.48%)
8EBM (default)1255.31145.0–1333.30.2707.5514.69% (8.09%)
9GBM (default)1221.81146.5–1301.90.2168.1813.35% (10.02%)
10TABDPT_GPU (default)1196.81103.2–1305.80.2358.6613.57% (7.37%)
11HUGIML1136.51018.9–1228.30.1559.7919.27% (8.76%)
12NN_TORCH (default)1084.1992.2–1169.30.07710.7417.75% (13.26%)
13FASTAI (default)1039.8942.8–1140.40.06911.5020.52% (14.86%)
14RF (default)1000.01000.0–1000.00.04412.1422.54% (15.07%)
15LR (default)911.6785.0–1028.10.03213.4229.93% (23.20%)
16XT (default)901.5843.0–952.70.03613.5525.28% (18.42%)
17KNN (default)536.0279.3–673.20.00016.4758.17% (54.22%)
Dataset-level pairing

HUGIML versus each official method

Positive error reduction favors HUGIML.

Official methodWinsTiesLossesError reduction · mean (median)
KNN (default)370149.96% (50.49%)
LR (default)320613.14% (12.67%)
XT (default)29092.98% (6.95%)
RF (default)25013-2.55% (4.87%)
FASTAI (default)25013-7.04% (3.20%)
NN_TORCH (default)22016-11.54% (1.06%)
EBM (default)10028-12.23% (-2.76%)
GBM (default)12026-16.97% (-4.08%)
XGB (default)11027-19.84% (-3.34%)
MNCA_GPU (default)9029-21.42% (-3.45%)
TABM_GPU (default)6032-21.55% (-5.47%)
REALMLP (default)18020-22.69% (-1.08%)
TABDPT_GPU (default)16022-24.88% (-1.20%)
CAT (default)5033-26.01% (-6.10%)
TABPFNV2_GPU (default)10028-29.52% (-3.41%)
TABICL_GPU (default)7031-40.52% (-5.86%)
Default · overall

Predictive metrics and HUGIML deltas

Positive delta favors HUGIML. Rows are ordered by mean ROC AUC.

MethodAccuracyBalanced accuracyF1ROC AUCLog loss
MeanMedianHUGIML deltaMeanMedianHUGIML deltaMeanMedianHUGIML deltaMeanMedianHUGIML deltaMeanMedianHUGIML delta
CatBoost0.88000.8963-0.00740.70330.7147-0.01380.58320.6626-0.01870.85780.8692-0.01170.28850.2699-0.0177
XGBoost0.87800.8967-0.00530.69820.7124-0.00870.57550.6648-0.01100.85220.8624-0.00610.29340.2770-0.0129
ExplainableBM0.87410.8938-0.00150.69210.7008-0.00270.57200.6643-0.00750.85030.8524-0.00420.30110.2938-0.0052
LightGBM0.87780.8959-0.00520.69800.7095-0.00850.57530.6653-0.01080.85010.8535-0.00400.29500.2761-0.0112
HUGIML0.87270.89170.00000.68950.70640.00000.56450.63910.00000.84610.84430.00000.30630.28020.0000
RandomForest0.87330.8882-0.00060.69440.6834-0.00490.57460.6416-0.01010.84110.84390.00500.32710.31450.0209
ExtraTrees0.87040.88560.00230.68140.66740.00810.55550.60390.00900.83650.83820.00950.33530.31770.0290
LinearModel0.85700.88190.01570.66170.65330.02780.52600.60230.03850.82600.80820.02010.35910.32840.0528
KNeighbors0.81950.83530.05320.60050.56980.08890.44390.45150.12060.69810.67070.14801.12951.04050.8232
HUGIML

Fitted paths and RPTE distributions

594 outer splits · LR 344 · RPTE 250

Counts identify the selected configuration for each outer split. RPTE values show median [Q25, Q75] of recorded outer-split observations. An em dash indicates that no RPTE branch was selected.

DatasetSplitsLR splitsRPTE splitsInputsActive treesActive leavesActive direct terms
Amazon_employee_access990————
anneal30030244 [218, 249]6 [5, 6]154 [149.2, 165.5]323.5 [287.2, 338]
APSFailure918196 [164.8, 299.5]15 [15, 15]788 [757, 820]436 [239, 814.2]
bank-marketing909119 [119, 121]5 [4, 5]281 [276, 287]497 [476, 513]
Bank_Customer_Churn92777 [76.5, 115]3 [3, 3]171 [163, 173.5]303 [289, 354.5]
Bioresponse927352 [271.5, 353]15 [15, 15]797 [778.5, 807.5]807 [597.5, 987]
blood-transfusion-service-center3029119 [19, 19]1 [1, 1]60 [60, 60]34 [34, 34]
churn909147 [97, 173]7 [6, 8]178 [158, 186]238 [144, 278]
coil2000_insurance_policies963150 [125.5, 213.5]13 [11, 14]452 [393, 452]228 [202, 336.5]
credit-g30282127.5 [103.8, 151.2]6 [6, 6]246.5 [241.8, 251.2]186.5 [133.8, 239.2]
credit_card_clients_default909205 [157, 246]5 [5, 5]307 [297, 316]966 [727, 1153]
customer_satisfaction_in_airline909281 [280, 282]10 [10, 10]807 [798, 819]1377 [1353, 1385]
diabetes3028222.5 [21.8, 23.2]2.5 [2.2, 2.8]112 [107, 117]62.5 [60.8, 64.2]
Diabetes130US990————
E-CommereShippingData90928 [28, 42]3 [3, 3]141 [133, 149]99 [72, 144]
Fitness_Club30291101 [101, 101]3 [3, 3]110 [110, 110]119 [119, 119]
GiveMeSomeCredit90994 [88, 99]2 [2, 2]170 [168, 171]534 [508, 540]
hazelnut-spread-contaminant-detection30300————
heloc98195 [95, 95]5 [5, 5]330 [330, 330]430 [430, 430]
hiva_agnostic90950 [50, 51]5 [5, 5]145 [136, 155]424 [414, 460]
HR_Analytics_Job_Change_of_Data_Scientists936277.5 [224.5, 331.2]13.5 [13, 14.8]679.5 [654.5, 684.2]677.5 [365, 833.2]
in_vehicle_coupon_recommendation909291 [289, 329]12 [12, 12]783 [774, 791]871 [847, 971]
Is-this-a-good-customer3021967 [64, 77]4 [4, 5]135 [125, 147]97 [78, 130]
jm1981123 [123, 123]4 [4, 4]240 [240, 240]457 [457, 457]
kddcup09_appetency981238 [238, 238]15 [15, 15]398 [398, 398]612 [612, 612]
Marketing_Campaign30300————
maternal_health_risk30030106.5 [94.2, 155.8]2 [2, 2]208 [198, 216]447.5 [390, 580]
MIC30300————
NATICUSdroid990————
online_shoppers_intention909184 [89, 187]7 [6, 7]289 [284, 292]538 [213, 609]
polish_companies_bankruptcy918201 [192.2, 215]8 [8, 8.2]304.5 [294, 320]432.5 [410.5, 493]
qsar-biodeg30291107 [107, 107]7 [7, 7]204 [204, 204]140 [140, 140]
SDSS17909415 [413, 415]15 [14, 15]486 [478, 494]2250 [2217, 2280]
seismic-bumps93642.5 [28, 60.8]3 [3, 3]106.5 [101.2, 111.8]66.5 [37.2, 95.8]
splice990————
students_dropout_and_academic_success990————
taiwanese_bankruptcy_prediction936165.5 [146.5, 179.2]11 [10.2, 11]322 [310, 341.5]279.5 [200, 344]
website_phishing30030202 [159.5, 203]4 [4, 4]305 [284.8, 334.8]504.5 [471.8, 535.8]
Methodology and interpretation
Methodology and interpretation

Comparison design

  • Local HUGIML results are joined to published TabArena results by exact dataset name and outer-split number.
  • Binary error is 1 − ROC AUC; multiclass error is log loss. Split errors are averaged within dataset before aggregation, giving every dataset equal weight.
  • Each tab is an independent comparison pool. Elo, ranks, normalized score, improvability, confidence intervals, and HUGIML pairwise results are recomputed within that pool.
  • AutoMLPipelineFeatureGenerator is fitted separately on every inner child training fold and retained with that child for validation and outer-test transformation; no validation or test rows contribute to preprocessing state.
  • The outer tests and metrics align. HUGIML evaluates 32 configurations, while each tuned official baseline evaluates 200; retained ensembles and compute budgets remain method-specific.
  • Detailed metric tables show mean, median, and the paired HUGIML advantage across accuracy, balanced accuracy, F1, ROC AUC, and log loss. Positive deltas favor HUGIML; log loss uses the lower-is-better direction.

HUGIML hyperparameters

32 configurations per outer split; eight retained inner-fold models per selected configuration. Binary selection uses ROC AUC; multiclass selection uses log loss. Selected parameters are recorded for each dataset and outer split.

ParameterSearch values
B-1
adaptive_binningtrue
L1, 2
topK50, 100, 150, 200
feature_modeoriginal_plus_patterns
G0.01, 0.001
convert_binary_to_categoricalfalse
augmented_pair_transformstrue
topk_budget_strictfalse
lr_solveradaptive_l1
lr_source_policymain_effect
lr_C0.5
base_estimatorLR (automatic sparse logistic regression); One-vs-Rest LeafWiseBoundedLookaheadRPTEFeatureLR (lr_C=0.5, lr_penalty=l1)